Legislative record

AB 1837STATE · CaliforniaIntroduced

Video imaging of parking violations.

Existing law authorizes a public transit operator in the state, until January 1, 2027, and authorizes the City and County of San Francisco indefinitely, to enforce parking violations in specified transit-only traffic lanes and at transit stops through the use of video imaging, and to install automated forward facing parking control devices on city-owned public transit vehicles for the purpose of video imaging parking violations occurring in transit-only traffic lanes, as specified. Existing law requires a public transit operator, prior to issuing notices of parking violations, to issue warning notices for the first 60 days and to make a public announcement of the program. Existing law requires a designated employee, or a contracted law enforcement agency, to review video image recordings for the purpose of determining whether a parking violation occurred in a transit-only traffic lane or at a transit stop and to issue a notice of violation to the registered owner of a vehicle within 15 calendar days, as specified. Existing law makes these video image records confidential and provides that these records are available only to public agencies to enforce parking violations. Existing law requires a public transit operator that implements an automated enforcement system to enforce parking violations in transit-only traffic lanes and at transit stops to submit a report to specified committees of the Legislature by no later than January 1, 2025. This bill would extend the authorization for the use of video imaging to enforce parking and stopping violations until January 1, 2034. The bill would require that a public transit operator issue warnings for 60 days prior to issuing notices of violations when it uses video imaging for enforcement of a violation that it has not previously used video imaging to enforce. The bill would require a public transit operator that uses video imaging to enforce parking violations to report to the Legislature, as specified. The bill would exempt the City and County of San Francisco from this requirement. The bill would allow only local agencies to use video image records to enforce parking violations and would prohibit the use or access of these records for general law enforcement purposes or by federal authorities, as specified. Existing constitutional provisions require that a statute that limits the right of access to the meetings of public bodies or the writings of public officials and agencies be adopted with findings demonstrating the interest protected by the limitation and the need for protecting that interest. This bill would make legislative findings to that effect. This bill would make legislative findings and declarations as to the necessity of a special statute for the City and County of San Francisco.

Voted 8/27/2026View source

Roll-call record

How representatives voted

60 yea·6 nay

Docket history

Action history

  1. 6/30/2026Read second time. Ordered to third reading.
  2. 6/29/2026From committee: Do pass. (Ayes 7. Noes 2.) (June 29).
  3. 6/24/2026From committee: Do pass and re-refer to Com. on P., D.T., & C.P. (Ayes 9. Noes 4.) (June 23). Re-referred to Com. on P., D.T., & C.P.
  4. 6/15/2026From committee chair, with author's amendments: Amend, and re-refer to committee. Read second time, amended, and re-referred to Com. on TRANS.
  5. 6/3/2026Referred to Coms. on TRANS. and P., D.T., & C.P.
  6. 5/21/2026In Senate. Read first time. To Com. on RLS. for assignment.
  7. 5/21/2026Read third time. Passed. Ordered to the Senate. (Ayes 61. Noes 6. Page 5177.)
  8. 4/27/2026Read second time. Ordered to third reading.
  9. 4/23/2026Read second time and amended. Ordered returned to second reading.
  10. 4/22/2026From committee: Amend, and do pass as amended. (Ayes 13. Noes 2.) (April 21).