Legislative record

AB 2234STATE · CaliforniaIntroduced

California Environmental Quality Act: geothermal exploratory projects.

The California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) requires a lead agency, as defined, to prepare, or cause to be prepared, and certify the completion of an environmental impact report on a project that it proposes to carry out or approve that may have a significant effect on the environment or to adopt a negative declaration if the lead agency finds that the project will not have that effect. CEQA also requires a lead agency to prepare a mitigated negative declaration for a project that may have a significant effect on the environment if revisions in the project would avoid or mitigate that effect and there is no substantial evidence that the project, as revised, would have a significant effect on the environment. Existing law establishes the Geologic Energy Management Division in the Department of Conservation. Existing law requires the division to be the lead agency for all geothermal exploratory projects for purposes of CEQA, except as provided. Existing law defines "geothermal exploratory project," for purposes of CEQA, in part as a project composed of not more than 6 wells and associated drilling and testing equipment whose chief and original purpose is to evaluate the presence and characteristics of geothermal resources. Existing law requires wells included within a geothermal exploratory project to be located at least 12 mile from geothermal development wells that are capable of producing geothermal resources in commercial quantities. This bill would expressly include, as part of a geothermal exploratory project, equipment and activities necessary to establish interconnectivity between wells and reservoirs, as provided. The bill would specify that the above-described 12 mile limit is measured from all points along the wellhead location and well course, including the bottom of the well, as provided.

Voted 8/31/2026View source

Roll-call record

How representatives voted

78 yea·0 nay

Docket history

Action history

  1. 7/6/2026Read second time and amended. Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
  2. 7/6/2026From committee: Amend, and do pass as amended and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 7. Noes 0.) (July 1).
  3. 6/24/2026From committee: Do pass and re-refer to Com. on N.R. & W. (Ayes 6. Noes 0.) (June 24). Re-referred to Com. on N.R. & W.
  4. 6/15/2026From committee chair, with author's amendments: Amend, and re-refer to committee. Read second time, amended, and re-referred to Com. on E.Q.
  5. 6/10/2026Referred to Coms. on E.Q. and N.R. & W.
  6. 5/28/2026In Senate. Read first time. To Com. on RLS. for assignment.
  7. 5/27/2026Read third time. Passed. Ordered to the Senate. (Ayes 79. Noes 0.)
  8. 5/18/2026Read second time. Ordered to third reading.
  9. 5/14/2026From committee: Do pass. (Ayes 15. Noes 0.) (May 14).
  10. 4/22/2026In committee: Set, first hearing. Referred to APPR. suspense file.